We found that the expression of 14 of 29 genes was significantly different (Physique ?(Physique66 and Supplemental Table 1) and that 10 of these 14 genes were among the 18 genes differentially expressed in the resting memory B cell subset; an additional 4 are known to be associated with virus-induced lymphocyte exhaustion and/or CD21lo B cells (43C45)

We found that the expression of 14 of 29 genes was significantly different (Physique ?(Physique66 and Supplemental Table 1) and that 10 of these 14 genes were among the 18 genes differentially expressed in the resting memory B cell subset; an additional 4 are known to be associated with virus-induced lymphocyte exhaustion and/or CD21lo B cells (43C45). provide valuable insight into virus-specific B cell responses in HIV contamination and demonstrate that memory B cell abnormalities may contribute to the ineffectiveness of the antibody response in infected individuals. Introduction A small number of human anti-HIV antibodies with modest neutralizing activity were identified prior to 2009, after which and in quick succession, several broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) with potent activity were isolated from prescreened HIV-infected individuals (1C6). The methods used to screen and produce these novel bNAbs incorporated improvements in HIV envelope protein engineering and a variety of technologies, including high-throughput screening of serum designed to measure HIV-neutralizing antibody activities (7C11). The cumulative data from these analyses also revealed (3β,20E)-24-Norchola-5,20(22)-diene-3,23-diol that while the antibody response against HIV occurs within weeks of acquisition of contamination, these early antibodies are largely non-neutralizing and unlikely to contribute to the control of HIV replication (12). Furthermore, only after several years of HIV contamination do a limited percentage, in the range of 10% to 30%, of untreated individuals develop serologic activities that are broadly neutralizing (9, 13). However, as responses broaden, whether from a single or a combination of bNAb specificities, they are nonetheless ineffective at clearing or controlling the computer virus in infected individuals from whom they are isolated (14). Functional HIV envelope spikes are sparsely distributed over the surface of the virion, and each is composed of a trimer of noncovalently associated surface glycoprotein gp120 and transmembrane protein gp41 molecules (9, 11). This complex interacts with its main receptor (CD4) and subsequently with a chemokine coreceptor (CoR) expressed on the surface of target cells. Both CD4 and CoR binding sites (bs) of gp120 are highly conserved and immunogenic, with immunogenicity being especially true of the latter site. All bNAbs that have been isolated thus far target the HIV envelope spike and have been classified into 4 groups that reflect sites targeted by the bNAbs; these include the CD4bs, the membrane (3β,20E)-24-Norchola-5,20(22)-diene-3,23-diol proximal external region of gp41, as well as glycan-dependent sites in V1/V2 loops and the V3 loop of gp120 (7, 9, 11). The bNAbs directed against the CD4bs, all of which were generated with HIV envelope probes used to identify and sort HIV-specific B cells (3, 15), have been shown to be highly potent and possess comparable features (3C5, 14, 16). However, such CD4bs bNAbs are thought to develop infrequently and only after several years of contamination (9). In contrast, antibodies directed against the CoRbs emerge relatively early, yet few of these antibodies demonstrate neutralizing activity against HIV, likely at least in part because access to the CoRbs is restricted (17C20). Many of the recently isolated antibodies directed against the CD4bs have high levels of somatic mutation (3C5), a property that likely reflects prolonged affinity maturation of B cell clones. While neutralizing antibodies have been extensively analyzed, and several hypotheses Rabbit Polyclonal to OR56B1 have been put forth to explain why bNAbs are not readily produced in infected individuals, very little is known regarding the nature of the B cells from which HIV-specific antibodies originate (7, 9C11). Although HIV does not productively infect B cells, numerous phenotypic and functional abnormalities of B cells have been explained in HIV disease (21, 22). The indirect and prolonged effects of ongoing HIV replication have been associated with aberrant B cell activation, increased B cell exhaustion, as well as deficiencies in the development of normal B cell memory (21). Whereas resting memory B cells represent the predominant memory subset in healthy individuals, their frequencies are (3β,20E)-24-Norchola-5,20(22)-diene-3,23-diol reduced in almost all stages of HIV disease, regardless of treatment status (21, 22). In untreated HIV-viremic individuals, tissue-like and activated memory B cells are the predominant memory subsets, the former being associated with HIV-induced cellular exhaustion and the latter, apoptosis (21). In addition, there is evidence that HIV directly interacts with B cells through nonspecific mechanisms, such as.